Review Process
Our journal maintains a knowledgeable team of editors and expert peer-reviewers to ensure the quality of submissions. After receiving an article, the editor reviews its validity, quality, and overall intellectual content, deciding whether to accept, reject, revise, or request further changes before peer review.
Peer Review Process
The peer review panel, composed of subject-matter experts, evaluates the article’s originality, structure, and contribution to the field. This ensures the article meets the journal's standards. Additionally, plagiarism is checked, and the article must adhere to academic integrity standards.
Once an article passes peer review, it is assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and indexed through Crossref for tracking and citation.
Editorial Responsibilities Include:
-
Initial Screening: The editorial team checks the article's alignment with the journal's scope, quality, language, and submission guidelines.
-
Plagiarism Check: Manuscripts undergo a plagiarism detection scan. If plagiarism is detected, the manuscript is rejected, and the author is notified.
-
Peer Review: The article is sent to subject-matter experts for a double-blind review of novelty, methodology, results, and relevance.
-
Feedback and Revision: Authors receive reviewer comments and are asked to revise. The editorial team ensures necessary corrections are made.
-
Final Decision: The editorial team makes a final decision (accept, revise, reject) based on the reviewers’ assessments.
-
Ethical Compliance: Editors and reviewers avoid conflicts of interest and maintain confidentiality.
-
Timeliness: The review and publication process is conducted swiftly while upholding high standards.
Conclusion
Our journal is committed to high publishing standards. Each manuscript is treated with fairness and academic rigor, ensuring the publication of impactful research that meets international indexing and ethical benchmarks.
