SCREENING OF α -AMYLASE FROM RHIZOSPHERIC SOIL ISOLATES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/n5zrvw94Keywords:
α-amylase, Rhizosphere, Bacillus, enzyme kinetics, Gram-negative bacteriaAbstract
Amylases are crucial hydrolytic enzymes with wide industrial relevance, particularly in food processing, textiles, paper manufacturing, and biofuel production (Gupta et al., 2003; Ray et al., 2015). Among them, α-amylase is distinguished by its capacity to cleave internal α-1,4-glycosidic linkages in starch, enabling rapid saccharification under mild conditions (Pandey et al., 2000). This study aimed to isolate and characterize α-amylase-producing bacteria from rhizosphere soils of Shivamogga District, Karnataka—a region within the Western Ghats known for its rich microbial diversity and endemism (Singh et al., 2016; Jaiswal et al., 2020). Using serial dilution, starch agar screening, and Gram staining, 25 bacterial isolates were obtained, with six demonstrating starch hydrolysis through clear halo zones. The highest enzyme-producing isolates (SSCMBSAR3 and SSCMBSAR5) were identified as Gram-positive bacilli, likely belonging to the Bacillus genus, corroborating their reputation as prolific amylase producers (Gupta et al., 2003; Ajayi & Fagade, 2006). One Gram-negative coccus (SSCMBSAR2) also exhibited notable activity, highlighting underexplored microbial groups like Neisseria and Pseudomonas (Madigan et al., 2017). Quantitative enzyme assays using the DNS method (Miller, 1959; Chi et al., 2009) revealed peak α-amylase activity at 48 hours of incubation and optimal substrate concentration at 400 mg starch, followed by substrate inhibition at higher concentrations—demonstrating a bell-shaped kinetic profile consistent with Michaelis-Menten dynamics (Segel, 1993). The co-detection of protease activity indicates a need for further purification or genetic modifications to eliminate non-specific enzymes (Haq et al., 2010). This study underscores the rhizosphere as a fertile bioprospecting niche and affirms the industrial potential of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative soil bacteria in enzyme biotechnology.
References
1. Ajayi, A. O., & Fagade, O. E. (2006). Growth pattern and structural nature of amylase produced by Bacillus species. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5(5), 440–444.
2. Asgher, M., Asad, M. J., Rahman, S. U., & Legge, R. L. (2007). A thermostable α-amylase from a moderately thermophilic Bacillus subtilis strain for starch processing. Journal of Food Engineering, 79(3), 950–955.
3. Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L., & Stryer, L. (2002). Biochemistry (5th ed.). W.H. Freeman and Company.
4. Bhatti, H. N., Rashid, M. H., Nawaz, R., & Asgher, M. (2007). Optimization of media for enhanced production of alpha-amylase by a thermophilic Bacillus sp. using statistical approach. Bioresource Technology, 98(11), 2284–2289.
5. Cappuccino, J. G., & Welsh, C. (2017). Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual (11th ed.). Pearson Education.
6. Cappuccino, J.G., & Sherman, N. (2014). Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual. Pearson Education.
7. Chi, Z., Chi, Z., Zhang, T., Liu, G., & Yue, L. (2009). Inulinase-expressing microorganisms and applications of inulinases: A review. Process Biochemistry, 44(5), 499–508.
8. Gupta, R., Gigras, P., Mohapatra, H., Goswami, V. K., & Chauhan, B. (2003). Microbial α-amylases: A biotechnological perspective. Process Biochemistry, 38(11), 1599–1616.
9. Haq, I., Ashraf, H., & Qadeer, M.A. (2010). Production of α-amylase by Bacillus licheniformis using an economical medium. Bioresource Technology, 97(17), 2093–2100.
10. Jaiswal, D.K., Verma, R., & Jaiswal, S. (2020). Microbial diversity and soil health: Role of rhizospheric microorganisms in sustainable agriculture. Rhizosphere Biology, 1, 75–93.
11. Madigan, M.T., Bender, K.S., Buckley, D.H., Sattley, W.M., & Stahl, D.A. (2017). Brock Biology of Microorganisms (15th ed.). Pearson.
12. Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426–428.
13. Nair, P.S., & Surendran, P.K. (2004). Biochemical and molecular characterization of starch-degrading bacteria isolated from marine sediment. Food Biotechnology, 18(4), 375–386.
14. Nelson, D. L., & Cox, M. M. (2008). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (5th ed.). W.H. Freeman.
15. Pandey, A., Nigam, P., Soccol, C. R., Soccol, V. T., Singh, D., & Mohan, R. (2000). Advances in microbial amylases. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 31(2), 135–152.
16. Prescott, L. M., Harley, J. P., & Klein, D. A. (2020). Microbiology (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
17. Ray, R.R., Ray, R., & Ray, R. (2015). Amylases: Characteristics, sources, and applications. In: Industrial Enzymes (pp. 121–142). Springer.
18. Segel, I. H. (1993). Enzyme Kinetics: Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-State Enzyme Systems. Wiley.
19. Sharma, R., Gupta, R., & Singh, R. (2020). Bacterial proteases: an overview of production, purification and enzymatic properties. Biotechnology Advances, 28(6), 930–938.
20. Shyam, M., Kumari, P., & Ramakrishna, W. (2013). Production and characterization of thermostable amylase from Bacillus species DLB9. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 1(4), 18–24.
21. Singh, J.S., Pandey, V.C., & Singh, D.P. (2016). Efficient soil microorganisms: A new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 230, 19–28.
22. Singh, R., Dubey, A., & Maheshwari, D.K. (2016). Rhizosphere microbiome: significance in rhizosphere soil health. In D.K. Maheshwari (Ed.), Rhizosphere Biology (pp. 1–28). Springer.
23. Sundaram, A., & Murthy, T. P. K. (2014). α-Amylase production and applications: A review. Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2(4), 166–175.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shilpa S, Rithu R., Manoj S.P., Shrinidhi Bhandari K.T., Sanjana V. , S.E. Neelagund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
